Recycling Sour Water Stripper Bottoms for Cooling Towers, Boiler Feedwater
Oil refining is dependent on the use of the distillation process.
However, in the course of this procedure, condensed water accumulates
in the overheads of the extraction columns. While this water is
essentially distilled, the soluble gases and soluble hydrocarbons
remain entrained and are in equilibrium with ionic species in the
water, depending on the pH.
In most refineries, the overheads send water to a central collection
where it is stream-stripped for bulk removal of NH3 and H2S. There are
other similar small-volume sources of water that are sent to the sour
water stripper (SWS) as well. In medium-sized refineries, there are
typically 30 sources feeding the stripper. Some of the SWS-treated
water, or "Bottoms," is sent to the desalter as wash water and from
there becomes wastewater. The excess of unused SWS Bottoms for
desalting is transferred directly to the wastewater treatment plant
(WWTP).
After specific treatment of the SWS Bottoms for these contaminants,
this water is not only considered a suitable quality for steam and
cooling systems but actually becomes a superior quality similar to
steam condensate. Further, this captured SWS-treated water produces
substantial fuel value in the form of heat. Similar to steam
condensate, this water can bypass normal boiler feedwater pretreatment
systems such as ion exchange or reverse osmosis (RO) and can proceed
directly to the boiler deaerator.
Occasionally, SWS units are not operated or maintained correctly. A
system with a significant presence of the three aforementioned
inorganic cations would be overlooked as a candidate for water reuse.
Most commonly, these cations enter the SWS system either by cooling
water intrusion from piping and condenser leaks or by using an
unsuitable water injection source in the distillation column overheads
for the forcing of the dewpoint to initiate condensation.
These two conditions ultimately cause major problems in the SWS
units themselves, such as the deterioration of the SWS trays, which
will cause serious SWS performance problems and will require repairs.
These problems almost always are short term with respect to the
presence of these inorganic cations in the Bottoms, as the SWS cannot
operate very long under these conditions.
In addition to boiler feedwater supply, the same considerations
regarding scale formation exist as the criteria for the justification
of SWS water reuse as cooling tower supply water; this also has an
attractive return on investment. The validation for this cooling tower
make-up can be found in the increased cycles of concentration, which
would be tolerable in the cooling towers with the treated SWS water.
This translates to substantial reductions in the volume of supply water
used, wastewater generated and cost of chemical treatment in cooling
tower operations.
The economic basis for the justification of water reuse investment
at the SWS is substantially more attractive for boiler feedwater than
it is for cooling tower make-up water. The return on investment for SWS
Bottoms reuse as boiler feedwater is based on the reduction in the cost
of treating wastewater; the decrease in the cost of supply water
pretreatment; and the capture of SWS heat, which reduces deaerator
heating fuel costs.
Interestingly, for those plants required to meet selenium NPDES
permit limits, the routing of the SWS Bottoms to the boilers inherently
extracts more than 80 to 90 percent of the total selenium load to the
wastewater treatment plant, thus eliminating any selenium removal needs
in the facility in almost all cases.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar